To have your photo featured in Visual Photo Critique, leave a link to one of your photos in the comments.
Photo Critique #1
(Photo by Martin Kling)
This photo was really well processed. The details are sharp and the textures have contrast without dominating. I’m a fan of the blue toning, especially because the blacks are still black. What this photo lacks, in my opinion, is a clear subject. The glowing ring of alien abduction is too far away to hold attention, and in general my eyes are searching for a focal point to land on. Otherwise, the symmetrical composition is nearly perfect (at first I didn’t notice that it’s slightly off).
Photo Critique #2
(Photo by Kyle Dyson)
Wildlife photography is a lot more difficult than Christopher Dodds makes it look, well done Kyle. The focus looks right, as does the exposure. Although it’s debatable whether a tighter crop would be an improvement, in the end I think that shot is nearly as good as it’s going to get. Where I think this image could be improved is with a more compelling pose from the duck and a shallower depth of field. Were our feathered friend centimeters from the water’s surface straining to take off with the foreground and background blurred out by a lower f-stop, then I think you’d have a portfolio piece (here’s an example of what I mean).
Photo Critique #3
(Photo by Holger Gräbner)
Everyone look at this shot and note how the sky looks. When the sky is this color, it’s time to take pictures. That’s exactly what Holger did and it works in his favor here. Also, this location is ripe for shooting, great job getting yourself to a prime location. One area that could use improvement is white balance. Currently the image has an orange cast. This is easily fixed by tapping “W” in Lightroom or using the grey eye dropper tool in the Curves Adjustment layer (or Levels) inside Photoshop. Also, be sure to make it clear where you want viewers to look in your picture. Often when I’m shooting, it’s obvious to me what the subject of my shots are. When reviewing on the computer later, however, I realize that I didn’t isolate the subject well enough within the frame. In this case, consider cropping tighter on the tower.
Photo Critique #4
(Photo by Cho Tang)
Somehow I doubt that Cho was unsure about the quality of this image, but still, this is a great example of the kind of photo critique that doesn’t happen enough. There isn’t anything wrong with this shot. If pressed, I might crop it tighter to put the subject’s eye line on a thirds line. Really though, we should take a second to note the things are going right so hopefully they are remembered in future shoots. What drew me in to this shot wasn’t the interesting subject, but the overall unity of the color palette. The light cyans and yellows set the tone well and compliment the rainy atmosphere. Next is the clear, compelling subject. Great expression, cool lighting from the umbrella, not something I see everyday. Finally, it’s technically well executed and processed. The blacks are black and the highlights are bright. Well done Cho.

Thanks for sharing this photo critique. I learned a lot from this write up.
The photo shoots are amazing.
Thanks so much for choosing my picture and critiquing. I agree with your comments – I contemplated cropping but didn’t want to cut off the reflection. Your idea of applying the rule of thirds does make the crop work nicely, though. The crop is pobably one of the main things I looked at and struggled with and was a reason to submit for critique.
I also agree it would be a neat shot if it wasn’t already on the ice, but she came in at a steep angle and when the feet are still in the air, the reflection of the water just wasn’t there yet because of the solid surface of the ice underneath her.
Great tips and much appreciated!
I can see how the reflection angle was key to get this image and even a few inches would make a difference. Ah well, it’s still a good shot and right on the money technically. Keep an eye out for really dramatic and dynamic poses in the future and I’m sure you’re wildlife portfolio will keep developing well
~Andrew
Excellent write-up Andrew as usual. These posts are always helpful especially to see other points of view.
That guy in the rain is a very strong shot. Wonderful. Nice work as well to the others, they all look good. Nice write ups and critique as always.
Hey thanks mate! You are right, I am indeed very happy with this shot. It’s my favorite shot of gallery where I feel I’m the weakest.
It’s funny that you mentioned the possibility of cropping it. This shot was already a crop and I’m actually a rule of thirds fiend myself, but somehow my argument was not to cut off the umbrella. I don’t know, I get compulsive like that at times.
All in all though, thanks very much for taking your time to write this feedback.
For me the hardest photos to edit are my own. To be honest, I couldn’t think of much to say about the flower shot or the vertical landscape. Maybe the clouds were a bit busy(?). Haha. Great work.
thank you Andrew,
I’ve read your critiques and looked at my photo, and read your critiques and looked back to the photo and must say, you’re right.
Your comments are very helpful and I will follow your proposals. Your sketch is really good and shows the minor areas of the photo. Your advices give me another view to my own photo and I am sure they will improve the photo. The own view on the own photos is sometimes a bit foggy. It helps much more to have a real statement of things to improve.
Thanks for your time and efforts, worth to be recommended.
Glad it helped Holger. I find it helps to get a fresh perspective from someone less emotionally attached. Usually of the shots I take, my favorites are the ones that I have great memories around but aren’t necessarily the best pictures.
Feel free to submit another photo if you like